🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

A letter obtained by media dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The company is attempting amendments to a pending law that include decreasing the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during broader worries about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Recently, international health experts raised concerns that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of corporate influence worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” said Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

In the letter, BAT suggests this be decreased to 30% or 50% “according to global guideline limits”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the law is enacted.

International experts specifically advises a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, arguing that it would lead smokers to “black market” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for different infractions “varying from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the company executive of the Zambian branch claims the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but claims that “specific rules can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We reside in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and harvest that and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative stated: “The company operates its activities following with current country statutes. Additionally, the corporation engages in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which provide for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the representative commented, mentioning that young individuals should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” they said, adding that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which includes increasing amounts of black market activity”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.