🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam order, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to use a newly configured congressional map that is projected to include up to five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three ruling, released on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to set aside a district court's ruling that had struck down the new map in November.

Court's Reasoning

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing significant confusion and disrupting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in justifying its ruling.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had likely grouped voters based on their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the new maps. It had mandated the state to employ the boundaries drawn after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

Through a strongly worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's decision. She stated that it disrespected the work of the district court, pointing out that its opinion was actually authored by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a violation of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Struggle

The court's action is part of a nationwide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican hold. Usually, redistricting occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, for their part, have pushed back with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State AG hailed the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

In contrast, opposition party leaders decried the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major party election organization.

Another senior House leader argued the court had yet again damaged its legitimacy by approving a discriminatory map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.